A universal language Essay

According to a biblical account found in the book of Genesis, people once spoke the comparable language. Then, because those people band together to build a tower in Babylon that glorified their own achievements, rather than those of their deity, God penalize them. He ensured that mankind spoke different languages so that theyd never be able to pasture together to dishonor God again. Was there once secure a single language that alone people could understand? Linguists dont know theres just not plenty information about the origins of language, and there are only theories about how our early ancestors formed their first spoken communication and sentences. Did early people imitate sounds they heard in the environment? Did they babble until certain sounds took on means? Well likely never know, though linguists still study babies brains to determine if language or grammar comes hardwired in our heads. peerless prominent theory about the development of the first languages relate s to tools and resources. Teaching another person how to use tools requires a certain, agreed-upon vocabulary, as does the process of sharingand protecting resources like food and shelter. Small groups of people living in close quarters would therefore need to develop a way to understand each other, so they came up with a vocabulary and syntax that meant any(prenominal)thing to them.A group of people across the innovation from them, though, would probably need an entirely different vocabulary of words, so the languages would have developed differently in isolation. conjecture of the oft-quoted (but erroneous) example that Eskimos have 100 different words for snow because they have so much of it. succession that common statement is wrong, there are cultures that have far more words for rice and camels than, say, English does. So these small groups of people, living in isolation from one another, agreed on names for their tools and food, and they came up with ways to describe how resources would be divided. But when another group migrated into the area, or came with different resources to trade, the groups had to find a way to merge their different lexicons and communicate. Over time, thats how languages have developed, and as some groups conquered others, thats how some languages died out.Travel among groups who speak different languages has been problematical over history now, we live in a world where we can board a plane in New York City and land in chinaware hours later. In a global world, wouldnt there be a benefit to speaking the same language? Some groups have advocated that a universal language be adopted, but it would be difficult to find any group willing to give up their own language if only because so much culture and history sours embedded within it over time. After all, the English would no preferably give up the language of Shakespeare than the Spanish would forsake the tongue of Cervantes. Attempts to create a universal endorse language have failed as well, but even if we could agree on a common language, its unlikely it would resemble itself 100 years from now. After all, thanks to the Internets influence, language has become a mix of emoticons and abbreviations like LOL. Languages simply evolve too rapidly to ever speak just one.